In Congressional Hearing, IFA’s Haller Details Importance of Franchise Business Model, Sounds Alarm on NLRB’s Joint Employer Rule 

Share

“With Joint Employer Looming, Franchising Stands At The Crossroads.” </span></span></span></em></span></span></p>

 </em></span></span>WASHINGTON</span></span></strong> – Testifying before a key congressional subcommittee, Matt Haller, president and CEO of the International Franchise Association (IFA), highlighted the significant economic benefits of the franchise business model, while warning lawmakers of the severe economic consequences of the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) final joint employer rule. </span></span></span></span></p>

“While declaring a franchisor and its franchisees to be joint employers might reduce some obstacles to unionization across franchise systems, it would have the devastating consequence of destroying the franchise business model that powers the U.S. economy,” said Haller. “Should the NLRB be allowed to proceed with its proposed rule, it would break the franchise model. Congress must step in and preserve this business model that has helped thousands of brands provide the American Dream of small business ownership to people from all walks of life.” </span></span></span></span></p>

Finalized in October 2023 and scheduled to take effect in February 2024, the final joint employer rule would disrupt the franchise model by collapsing the independence of franchisees as business owners, making them employees of and/or co-employers with their franchisor. The rule would also diminish franchisees’ equity in their businesses and force franchisors to offer less support. New research</a> from Oxford Economics details franchisees’ concerns with the proposal. </span></span> </u></span></span></p>

As written, the NLRB rule would result in</a>: </span></span></span></span></p>

Search